WWW.LHPSagahowardsubplot.blogspot.com is not up yet.It is in www.LHPResponds.blogspot.com
WWW.LHPRESPONDS.BLOGSPOT.COM RE:HOWARD...... he wants $4,572.40 total for what he 'did'.
WWW.LHPRESPONDS.BLOGSPOT.COM RE:HOWARD...... he wants $4,572.40 total for what he 'did'.
8-11-14.Re:Howard's Billing. Not only did Howard 'use up' the $3,500.00 retainer for 'writing that letter', he also billed us and sent the bill email and direct mail wanting an additional $1,072.40 for: previous balance over the $3,500.00 for writing that letter- $284.75, including fees for reading Atty.L.Reynolds reply to his letter and for reading another letter from Atty. Reynolds. corrections,amount add.
So, he wants $4,572.40 total for what he 'did'.He did not mail us or email us a copy of the second letter he charged us for.I didn't even know about it,7-22-14 which was a complaint from Atty L.Reynolds,until 8-7-14, when I had to ask Atty.LReynolds and Howard's legal assistant to finally send me a copy.Both did. Howard should be working for the opposition. Ineffective work and the opposing maneuver of making it too expensive to fight back. From the beginning, with Atty.Yates and the City and law enforcement, the strategy was to make this too expensive for us to fight back.
Orner subplot: opportunistic,overpricing,padding, ineffectiveness, deceit, predatory lawyering
Perhaps the two firms should merge as the result is the same- the City and law enforcement continue and are protected and we pay a lot of money.
DECEIT,OVERPRICING
There was and is no reasonable expectation or assumption that Orner or any Atty. in that situation on a Case,on going, not new, would use that Retainer up on a letter.
This is predatory lawyering and deceit. We,as clients,and no clients would ever hand over to an Attorney $3,500.00 to write a preliminary letter for damages in an ongoing legal situation with so much spent on the Case already.This was not overtly started or even hinted at or implied. Otherwise the money would not have been handed over. There were no innuendos that Howard would ever use up the retainer on that letter or try to.
IN THIS LETTER PACKET WAS:
This letter packet consisted of a copy of the Settlement Agreement which I provided for him,which he already overcharged us $17,000,00 for his work finalizing it- It could not be enforced. He would not help us after he got the $17,000,00 unless we paid him more money
IN THIS LETTER PACKET WAS: A previous letter he had written which I provided for him which he already overcharged us $1,500.00 for,basically complaining that the Sett. agree.-was disregarded- it did not work no benefits for our predicament
IN THIS LETTER PACKET WAS:The Letter to opposing atty.which was my concept which he watered down.He and his Atty.Assoc. could not think of what to do.We did not expect this letter or letter packet to be more than $500.00. After over five weeks with no results, I called the firm and complained and Howard finally called to discuss the letter and I suggested the civil rights violation over a ten year period,which he used. watered down.
Inclusion in Bar complaint:Letter Packet to Cirullo/ Reynold's reply/Howard's billing/second letter from Reynolds and my reply to that.And,relevant emails posted on blog. To be cont.
www.lighthousepointflorida.net Click BLOG on the homepage to get